In Defense of Good Women
by Marilyn J. Zimmerman
In Defense of Good Women is the story of Victoria Stephens, a successful, hard-nosed criminal defense attorney appointed by the court to represent a seventeen-year-old minister’s daughter charged with murder in the drowning death of her newborn child. Victoria faces a hostile community, a salivating press, an uncooperative client, but most of all, a nagging intuition that she should not be handling this case. Forced to delve into the psychology of neonaticide as she searches for a defense, Victoria discovers a link between this case and her own past which, once uncovered, leads her beyond the boundaries of not just her profession but the law.
Set on the banks of the majestic St. Clair River in southeastern Michigan, In Defense of Good Women explores America’s arbitrary treatment of women accused of infanticide, the drug of ambition, and above all, the power of secrets.
-
Sometime later, in another cell, a toilet whooshes and a thick body in a brown uniform appears outside my cell. It’s Art Jones, the burly undersheriff, the man in charge of this place. He switches on the fluorescents; the hall lights buzz and snap to attention, and he steps back, rocks on his heels and watches me. Despite the oppressive heat, I feel a chill.
“The prosecutor’s here,” he says in a low voice.
Barrett?
Josephine, the day-shift matron, appears in my cell, removes the untouched tray and returns, holding a chain and a pair of handcuffs. “Use the toilet.” She’s a large woman who pronounces her words sharply, loud enough for Art to hear. “There’s none where we’re going.”
“Move it, Counselor,” Art says. “Just get yourself in those cuffs so we can bring you up front.”
I stand, raise my chin and square my shoulders.
Josephine points to the floor in front of her. “Arms up. By your face.”
Stepping closer, I raise my arms and clasp my hands together. She wraps the chain around my waist and loops the handcuffs through. I start when the metal touches my bruises.
“What happened?” she asks.
“A present from the bondsman.”
Her eyes don’t leave my face when she locks the metal bands, giving the key an exaggerated twist. Not tight enough to rub. “He prob’ly just didn’t want you to slip away. Again.” Spoken so Art can hear. I wonder if she’s on my side in all this but I don’t trust her enough to ask. Women, in particular, seem to have strong feelings about what I’ve done.
I silently mouth my thanks, and she cradles my elbow with her hand as she propels me forward, following Art past the other women’s cells, most of which are empty. A toothless woman in one grins at us; her pasty arm reaches into the hall and points ominously at our little parade.
We reach the men’s block, and Art unlocks a heavy door, slams it behind us, then leads us through the periphery of cells. There’s hollering, the giggling of perky hosts on a local morning TV show, a series of doors to be unlocked and resecured. We reach the rear of the building, the side facing the river, and Art nods toward the opening of a dingy room. When he flips a light switch and points, I step inside, resisting the urge to jostle my chains as I walk past him. Art’s a cog in this screwed-up machine but he’s not the reason I’m in here.
A beat-up metal desk, a couple of wooden chairs, and a grimy, barred window await. The room’s chilly; there’s no heat other than what leaks from the corridor. In a corner of the dingy glass, a thick-bodied wolf spider stops working. Beyond the lacy strands of its web, the river’s thick, grey water reflects threatening skies. On the opposite shore, behind the Ontario petrol plants, a series of large, electrical towers stride toward Toronto like an alien chain gang.
In the twenty years I’ve practiced, I never showed up to promote a client’s cause without being meticulously prepared. Unlike my father, extemporaneous speeches were never my forte, so I outlined and memorized each and every point I planned to argue to a prosecutor, a judge, or a jury.
But I haven’t done a single thing to get ready for this morning’s meeting. This time I only have one argument to make, and it’s not legal, it’s personal. Besides, Barrett already knows what I have to say.
I sense the weight of the chains around my waist, the handcuffs rubbing the thin bones of my tender wrists, and I reflexively shudder. My eyelids feel heavy; suddenly, even thinking seems a burden I’m not sure I can manage. I need to be certain Barrett understands the consequences of all this, but can I find the words? What if he calls my bluff? These days I don’t know who he is or what he’s capable of.
I could also say the same about me. I was a big-shot attorney in a small town, a success according to all my aspirations, the very definition of the word until Callie came into my life. Then somehow my principles got fuzzy and confusing. I began questioning, then crossing every boundary I’d always valued: professional, legal, personal, even geographical, it didn’t matter.
My thoughts drift to her, a seventeen-year-old girl who’s counting on me, and uncharacteristically I whisper a prayer, pleading with God to keep her safe. I know I’ll sacrifice myself if I have to, but I refuse to let her down. Not like I did before.
In the hall, Art and Josephine are making small talk. The spider resumes its spinning, oblivious to my presence. I take a breath and swallow what little saliva I can muster. Then I lower myself into the chair behind the desk and wait.
A NOTE FROM AUTHOR MARILYN J. ZIMMERMAN
I had plenty of doubts as I wrote this book: Who would want to read a book about infanticide? It’s a dark subject that make people uncomfortable, without question. But it’s also a reality of life and has been since humans peopled the earth. Ultimately, I decided this was a story I wanted to tell because it showcased an injustice in the American legal system I thought should be made known.
I’ve always been drawn to novels that include a social message without using the sledgehammer approach. I’m also drawn to novels that cause me to take a second (or third) look at an issue I assumed was settled for me when I began reading. I hoped In Defense of Good Women would give readers a look into the psychology of women who commit infanticide so the issue would not be as black-and-white as it likely was when they began reading.
I also hope this novel causes its readers to take a second (or third) look at the arbitrary treatment by the courts of women who commit infanticide. Perhaps these readers can bring attention to this injustice so that one day, like in so many first-world countries, infanticide is made a separate category of homicide. Then and only then will the psychological make-up of these women become a serious consideration in their charging, trial, and sentencing.
~ Marilyn J. Zimmerman